Species rarity#

Hint

Species rarity: the number of individuals present of the species in question, relative to the total number of individuals of all species (or how ‘represented’ is the species when considering the total number of individuals of all species). While technically “how rare” a species is will be change from place to place (e.g., will depend on geographic range, habitat specificity, local abundance, etc.; Crisfield et al., 2024), for the purposes of informing study design recommendations, the species rarity categories are defined as follows:

Probability of occupancy: the expected probability that a given camera site is occupied, for a given species (Kays et al., 2020)

Refer to the tabs below for more information.

Generally, species rarity can be thought of as the probability that the species occupies the site, for a given species (or study area, depending on the scale of interest) Kays et al., 2020.

Note

Species rarity can be generally thought of as a species characteristic, however, “not in the same sense that hair colour or wing venation… it’ an emergent trait of a species’ population and its environment rather than a trait of an individual organism” Kunin, 1997

How does this relate to study design?

Species rarity can influence the ideal camera arrangement. For example, when monitoring rare or cryptic species that are unlikely to be detected with other designs, it may be appropriate to use a where cameras are placed in areas that are known or suspected to have higher activity levels (e.g., game trails, mineral licks, etc.).

Species rarity can also influence the ideal number of cameras and survey length (Chatterjee et al., 2021). Low detection probability of rare or cryptic species can result in imprecise estimates if there are too few cameras or if cameras are not deployed for long enough (e.g., Steenweg et al., 2019)). Chatterjee et al. (2021) suggested that for occupancy models (MacKenzie et al., 2002) of common species, to survey a minimum of 50 sites for 15–20 days. For rare, elusive species, they recommended surveying 100 sites at a minimum for 20–30 days (Chatterjee et al., 2021).

Species rarity can influence the appropriate modelling approach. For measures of species richness or diversity, it is presumed that a camera is active long enough to detect rare species that may occur at a specific location (Wearn & Glover-Kapfer, 2017). If this is not the case, the results will indicate that the species was not present when it was (i.e., a “false negative”).

This section will be available soon! In the meantime, check out the information in the other tabs!

../_images/00_coming_soon.png

../_images/leroy_2024_Rarity_cutoff-point.png

Leroy (2024) The rarity cut-off point is here defined as the threshold of occurrence below which species are considered rare.

../_images/leroy_2024_Weight_assignation-curve.png

Leroy (2024) Weight assignation curve adjusted to an arbitrary rarity cut-off.

rtxt_figure3_ref_id

../_images/figure3_filename.png

Species accumulation and rarefaction curves

Generating a rarefaction curve from collector’s curves in R within the tidyverse (CC198)

rtxt_vid3_ref_id

Type

Name

Note

URL

Reference

R package

Package ‘Rarity’: Calculation of Rarity Indices for Species and Assemblages of Species

Allows calculation of rarity weights for species and indices of rarity for assemblages of species according to different methods (Leroy et al. 2012, Insect. Conserv. Divers. 5:159-168 doi:10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00148.x; Leroy et al. 2013, Divers. Distrib. 19:794-803 doi:10.1111/ddi.12040).

https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rarity/

Leroy, B. (2023). Package ‘Rarity’: Calculation of Rarity Indices for Species and Assemblages of Species. R package version 1.3-8, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rarity/

Online resource

Rarity Indices

Brief, understandable explanation of rarity indices

https://borisleroy.com/en/research/rarity-indices/

Leroy, B. (2024). Rarity Indices. https://borisleroy.com/en/research/rarity-indices/

Chatterjee, N., Schuttler, T. G., Nigam, P., & Habib, B. (2021). Deciphering the rarity-detectability continuum: optimizing Survey design for terrestrial mammalian community. Ecosphere 12(9), e03748. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3748
Crisfield, V. E., Guillaume Blanchet, F., Raudsepp‐Hearne, C., & Gravel, D. (2024). How and why species are rare: Towards an understanding of the ecological causes of rarity. Ecography, 2024(2), e07037. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07037
Flather, C. H., & Sieg, C. H. (2007). Species rarity: definition, causes, and classification. In M. G. Raphael, & R. Molina (Eds.), Conservation of Rare or Little-Known Species: Biological, Social, and Economic Considerations (pp. 40-66). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236965289_Species_rarity_definition_causes_and_classification#:~:text=Rarity%20is%20a%20relative%20concept,of%20other%20organisms%20of%20comparable
Kays, R., Arbogast, B. S., Baker‐Whatton, M., Beirne, C., Boone, H. M., Bowler, M., Burneo, S. F., Cove, M. V., Ding, P., Espinosa, S., Gonçalves, A. L. S., Hansen, C. P., Jansen, P. A., Kolowski, J. M., Knowles, T. W., Lima, M. G. M., Millspaugh, J., McShea, W. J., Pacifici, K., & Spironello, W. R. (2020). An Empirical Evaluation of Camera Trap Study Design: How Many, How Long and When? Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(6), 700-713. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13370
Kinnaird, M. F., & O'Brien, T. G. (2011). Density estimation of sympatric carnivores using spatially explicit capture-recapture methods and standard trapping grid. Ecological Applications, 21(8), 2908-2916. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41417102
Kunin, W. K. (1997). Introduction: on the causes and consequences of rare-common differences. In Kunin, W. K., & Kevin, J. G. (Eds) The Biology of Rarity. (pp. 3-4). Chapman & Hall. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-011-5874-9
Leroy, B. (2023). Package ‘Rarity’: Calculation of Rarity Indices for Species and Assemblages of Species. R package version 1.3-8, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rarity/
Leroy, B. (2024). Rarity Indices. https://borisleroy.com/en/research/rarity-indices/
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Royle, J. A., & Langtimm, C. A. (2002). Estimating Site Occupancy Rates When Detection Probabilities Are Less Than One. Ecology, 83(8), 2248-2255. https://doi.org/10.2307/3072056
O'Brien, K. M. (2010). Wildlife Picture Index: Implementation Manual Version 1. 0. WCS Working Paper No. 39. https://library.wcs.org/doi/ctl/view/mid/33065/pubid/DMX534800000.aspx
Riffomonas Project (2022b, Mar 24). Generating a rarefaction curve from collector's curves in R within the tidyverse (CC198) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywHVb0Q-qsM
Rowcliffe, J. M., Field, J., Turvey, S. T., & Carbone, C. (2008). Estimating animal Density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45(4), 1228-1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01473.x
Shannon, G., Lewis, J. S. & Gerber, B. D. (2014). Recommended Survey Designs for Occupancy Modelling using Motion-activated Cameras: Insights from Empirical Wildlife Data. PeerJ, 2, e532. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.532
Southwell, D. M., Einoder, L. D., Lahoz‐Monfort, J. J., Fisher, A., Gillespie, G. R., & Wintle, B. A. (2019). Spatially explicit power analysis for detecting occupancy trends for multiple species. Ecological Applications, 29, e01950. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1950
Steenweg, R., Hebblewhite, M., Whittington, J., & Mckelvey, K. (2019). Species‐specific Differences in Detection and Occupancy Probabilities Help Drive Ability to Detect Trends in Occupancy. Ecosphere, 10(4), Article e02639. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2639
mecks100 (2018, Feb 7). Species accumulation and rarefaction curves [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gcmAUpo9TU
Wearn, O. R., & Glover-Kapfer, P. (2017). Camera-Trapping for Conservation: A Guide to Best-ractices. WWF conservation technology series, 1, 1-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23409.17767