#

Hint

: A specific man-made or natural feature at which the camera is aimed to maximize the detection of wildlife species or to measure the use of that feature. Record ‘None’ if a FOV Target Feature was not used and ‘Unknown’ if not known. If ‘Other,’ describe in the Camera Location Comments.

Remote cameras may be deployed to capture detections on specific man-made or natural features (i.e., “FOV Target Feature“) to maximize the detection of wildlife species or to measure the use of that feature. “FOV Target Features may include, for example, game trails, human trails, watering holes, mineral licks, rub trees, nest sites, etc.

FOV Target Features differ from Camera Location Characteristics (see below) in that FOV Target Features are features the camera is aimed towards (e.g., a seismic line). In contrast, a Camera Location Characteristics may include features outside of the camera’s FOV (e.g., meadow habitat).

The decision of where exactly to place the camera will be influenced by the feature to target, the Survey Objectives and the number of Target Species, and, importantly, the sampling design, intended analysis and associated statistical assumptions.

Deploying cameras on or near FOV Target Features can provide meaningful information for some objectives, but often introduces detection biases (Wearn & Glover-Kapfer, 2017). These biases make it difficult to extrapolate findings to areas without these features or to collect data on multiple Target Speciesthat vary in their use of these features (Wearn & Glover-Kapfer, 2017). To reduce potential biases, cameras should ideally be deployed using a paired design, with cameras on- and off-FOV Target Features (e.g., on- and off-trails).

In general, cameras should be placed approximately 3–5 m from the FOV Target Feature (Figure 6; the “FOV Target Feature Distance (m)Figure 7). If cameras are placed too close to the FOV Target Feature, some species may not be detected since the camera may be too high to capture smaller species or the movement speed of certain species. In contrast, if cameras are placed too far from the FOV Target Feature (e.g., > 5 m), animals detected at night may not be visible in the images because they are less likely to be illuminated by the infrared flash.

This recommendation can be relaxed if users plan to estimate the detection distance (i.e., “the maximum distance that a sensor can detect a target” [Wearn and Glover-Kapfer, 2017]) and account for variability in detection probability.

0_figures/Survey-guidelines_WildCAM-FOV.png

Figure 6. Illustration of a remote camera showing (A) the FOV Target Feature (a trail), (B) the camera’s detection zone (everything inside the red outline), and (C) the distance of the camera to the FOV Target Feature. Note that the detection zone will vary according to Camera Make and Camera Model. Camera users will need to identify a suitable attachment point (e.g., tree, fence post/ stake) near the target area. The most suitable attachment point will depend on the Camera Height, angle, and direction since these choices will impact the FOV (see section 7.4). Figure from WildCAM Network (2019).

This section will be available soon! In the meantime, check out the information in the other tabs!

../_images/00_coming_soon.png
rtxt_figure1_ref_id

../_images/figure1_filename.png

figure1_caption

rtxt_figure2_ref_id

../_images/figure2_filename.png

rtxt_figure3_ref_id

../_images/figure3_filename.png

rtxt_figure4_ref_id

../_images/figure4_filename.png

rtxt_figure5_ref_id

../_images/figure5_filename.png

rtxt_figure6_ref_id

../_images/figure6_filename.png

rtxt_figure7_ref_id

../_images/figure7_filename.png

rtxt_figure8_ref_id

../_images/figure8_filename.png

rtxt_figure9_ref_id

../_images/figure9_filename.png

rtxt_figure10_ref_id

../_images/figure10_filename.png

rtxt_figure11_ref_id

../_images/figure11_filename.png

rtxt_figure12_ref_id

../_images/figure12_filename.png

rtxt_vid1_ref_id
rtxt_vid2_ref_id
rtxt_vid3_ref_id
rtxt_vid4_ref_id
rtxt_vid5_ref_id
rtxt_vid6_ref_id
rtxt_vid7_ref_id
rtxt_vid8_ref_id
rtxt_vid9_ref_id

Check back in the future!

shiny_name

shiny_caption

shiny_name

shiny_caption

shiny_name2

shiny_caption2

Type

Name

Note

URL

Reference

Clarke, J., Bohm, H., Burton, C., Constantinou, A. (2023). Using Camera Traps to Estimate Medium and Large Mammal Density: Comparison of Methods and Recommendations for Wildlife Managers. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18364.72320